property taxes

No New Taxes Needed, Rahm Says — Other Than 2.5 Percent Property Tax Bump

CITY HALL — City officials will not have to raise taxes to cover thelooming budget gap of $114.2 million — or to bridge the remaining shortfall facing the Chicago Public Schools, city officials said Tuesday.

That means the only new tax hike facing most Chicago homeowners in the next year will be the 2.5 percentschool property tax hike Emanuel has said is necessary to "avert a train wreck."

larger.jpg

The spending plan released Aug. 11 by CPS officials relied on $269 million from the city that has yet to be approved by the City Council. However, because the new school-funding formula includes about $450 million more for Chicago schools than last year — including the authority to to generate $125 million by hiking property taxes about 2.5 percent for the average homeowner — the gap is roughly half as big as initially expected, said Adam Collins, a spokesman for Emanuel.

"With historic school funding reform now the law in Illinois, and with the state of Illinois now covering some of the costs of Chicago teacher pensions for the first time ever, CPS' financial outlook has improved dramatically," Collins said.

The city's 2018-19 spending plan — set to be released next month — will include between $70 million and $80 million to cover the cost for Chicago Police officers to patrol the schools, Collins said.

That won't trigger the need for another tax hike on top of the one expected to be approved by the Chicago Board of Education, Collins said.

"We believe we can balance the city's budget without a citywide tax increase," Collins said.

However, Emanuel is still expected to ask aldermen to hike taxes on cell phones and land lines by 28 percent. That will keep the laborers' pension fund out of the red, officials said.

The remaining CPS budget gap — estimated between $40 million and $50 million — will be covered through "savings from interest and through refinancing debt," Collins said, as well as "administrative efficiencies such as procurement rebates and additional Medicaid revenue."

When the city's annual budget forecast was released in July, Emanuel declined to say whether more tax hikes were looming to bridge the projected gap — or to cover the second installment coming due on the mayor's promise to expand the Chicago Police Department by 970 positions.

City officials have announced plans to hire 266 police officers, 100 detectives and 75 sergeants in 2018, which is expected to cost approximately $60 million.

In addition, it is not clear how much the city will have to pay to reform the Police Department — under the authority of a federal judge — in the wake of the fatal shooting of Laquan McDonald.

Labor agreements with 90 percent of the city's 30,0000-member workforce expired June 30, meaning personnel costs could also rise more than anticipated by the annual budget forecast.

Emanuel has said he expects any new deal to include "savings in wages and benefits, health care and other places that are key to the city of Chicago’s future.”

The city's financial condition is also expected to benefit from a new authority to refinance up to $2.5 billion in debt under a new state law that could save taxpayers as much as $75 million a year, officials said. That method of debt management is already used in New York City, Philadelphia and Washington, and could raise the city's credit rating, officials said.

That refinancing is expected to be introduced to the City Council Wednesday, and could be approved in October.

Property Taxes Jump and Jaws Drop!

The property tax bill on Jeff and Roberta Price's Lincoln Park home was about $400 in 1977, the first year they lived there. It's been going up ever since, but rarely with the jolt of this year's 63 percent increase.

The increase, from $8,652 to $14,104, has the couple reconsidering their plan to retire in the Kenmore Avenue home where they raised their kids. They're looking at homes in Indiana "as a backup plan" for the time when Roberta retires in a few years, said Jeff Price, who is already retired.

"We have lived in our home for almost 39 years with the hope that we could remain here in our golden years," Jeff Price said. The increase in their tax bill amounts to about $454 a month, an amount they can squeak out, he said, but he's aware that for homeowners who struggle financially, it won't be easy.

"I don't know how anyone can plan their life with these unconscionable increases," Price said.

The Prices are among about 1.4 million residential property owners in Cook County facing an Aug. 1 deadline to pay the second installment of their 2015 property taxes. The tax bills, mailed out by the Cook County Treasurer's Office in June, are the first to reflect both the higher assessments of city properties' value that were released last fall and the city upping the pension part of its tax levy by $318 million.

Related: Your tax bill went up? Not as much as this guy's

Chicago homeowners' bills went up an average of 12.8 percent, Cook County Clerk David Orr said in June. Average increases were smaller in suburban parts of Cook County because they were not reassessed last year. North suburban homeowners' tax bills averaged an increase of 1.7 percent, and in southern suburbs, it was 2.1 percent.

In the city, "jaws are dropping when people see their new bills," said Mabel Guzman, an @properties agent.

Guzman said that shortly after the bills hit their mailboxes, two of her past clients whose bills jumped more than 30 percent called to look into selling their properties, in Edgewater and Hyde Park. Neither has sold yet, but one, the investor-owner of a Hyde Park townhouse, "isn't sure how to make the property work for him when you're billing him this outrageous amount for property taxes."

The bill for Benjy and Ella Lipsman's Humboldt Park townhouse shot up 77 percent, to $7,227. When they bought the house in October 2014, they thought the taxes were low compared to other properties they considered buying and expected them to go up given their home's proximity to the popular 606 trail, Benjy Lipsman said. But they were still taken aback by the hike, which works out to about $263 a month.

"It's not like our incomes have gone up while the mortgage payment stayed the same for a lot of years," he said. "This is a couple hundred extra dollars when we feel like we just bought the house recently."

Had they known how much the taxes would go up, they might have considered buying a slightly lower-priced house to leave room in their budget for the increase. As it is, "we've got no choice," he said. "We bought it."

'SHOCK TO THE SYSTEM'

Alfrede Delle saw it coming, too–or thought she did. When she bought a condo on Cleaver Street in Wicker Park in June 2015, the contract included an agreement that the seller would pay 110 percent of the past year's property taxes, an arrangement that typically insulates the buyer against annual increases. But 110 percent was far too small, as many buyers and sellers have learned in the past year. Her bill came in almost 40 percent higher, at $7,745.

"It was a shock to the system," Delle said.

The increase means Delle will need to pay about $182 more into her escrow account in her mortgage payment. (The majority of Chicago-area homeowners make monthly payments toward their property taxes in their mortgage payments. The lender keeps the money in an escrow account and pays it out when billed by the county.) She's looking into refinancing her mortgage at the low current interest rates, hoping to cover some of the increase by bringing down her house payment.

While Delle said she "might not" have bought a home if she'd known how much taxes would rise, she's staying put. That's what most people will do, said Fran Fyrman, an @properties agent and River North resident. At least they can deduct the extra expense from their federal and state income taxes.

"That's the way it is if you want to live in Chicago," Fryman said. "Taxes are going to go up, so enjoy your home and the write-off you get."

The office that mails the tax bills has been corrected.

Original article source: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/realestate/20160728/CRED0701/160729844/property-taxes-jump-and-jaws-drop?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=SocialFlow

Who Exactly is Affected by Chicago's Record Property Tax Hike?

Yesterday, the Chicago City Council voted in favor of a budget that will include a historic property tax hike of $589 million to fund the city's police and fire department pensions. And while we were warned about the looming property tax hike weeks ago, it seemed like there was a chance that the plan would face some stiff resistance. Instead, the budget passed in the city council yesterday in a 36-14 vote. But who will this record property tax increase really affect? In a geographic sense, the increase will spare much of the city's south and west sides. In fact, many homeowners throughout the south and west sides may actually have a lower property tax bill. However, some aldermen and activists have warned that the historic tax hike will hit renters the hardest.

Chicago Tax Increase Mapping.jpg

Rents throughout downtown and the North Side have been steadily increasing, with rents for a new studio in a luxury tower breaking the $2,000/month mark. The home buying and rental markets in neighborhoods like the West Loop, South LoopWicker ParkLogan SquareHumboldt Parkand even Avondale have been hotter than others, and the renters in these neighborhoods are the ones who should be most concerned about a possible increase in their rents. There have already been some neighborhood skirmishes in Logan SquareHumboldt Park and notably in Pilsen regarding runaway gentrification, and some activists say that the property tax increasewill only exacerbate the effects.

So, would the property tax hike prevent potential homebuyers from buying in Chicago, or would it cause current homeowners to leave the city? In a poll taken in September, Curbed readers were largely split. Many said that property owners were already paying enough, while the majority said that they could stomach the budget plan and the tax increase that will come with it. A smaller number said that they were still unsure but were concerned.

The new property tax increase will be rolled out over four years, with the biggest increase hitting homeowners next year. For 2015, the city will seek $318 million, then $109 million in 2016, $53 million in 2017 and finally, $63 million in 2018.

And the list of the aldermen who voted no to the plan:

- Ald. Brian Hopkins (2nd) 
- Ald. Susan Sadlowski Garza (10th)
- Ald. Roberto Maldonado (26th) 
- Ald. Jason Irvin (28th) 
- Ald. Chris Taliaferro (29th)
- Ald. Milly Santiago (31st) 
- Ald. Scott Waguespack (32nd) 
- Ald. Deb Mell (33rd)
- Ald. Carlos Ramirez-Rosa (35th)
- Ald. Gilbert Villegas (36th)
- Ald. Anthony Napolitano (41st)
- Ald. Brendan Reilly (42nd)
- Ald. Harry Osterman (48th) 
- Ald. Debra Silverstein (50th)

Article source: http://chicago.curbed.com/archives/2015/10/29/who-does-the-property-tax-hike-affect.php

How Property Taxes Are Crushing Illinois' Middle Class

Sticker shock

Joel Schurtz lived all across the U.S. before coming to Illinois. He took promising job opportunities where he could find them, from California to Alabama. His wife, Michelle, and their three young children would follow.

“Our family always had a plan,” Joel said. “We had three- to five-year goals and a plan. But when we came to Illinois that plan went out the window.”

Before the welcoming committee even arrived at their front door, the Schurtz family’s first property-tax bill arrived in the mail. “We laughed,” Michelle said. “That’s all we could do.”

The Schurtzes paid their first full year of property taxes in 2015. The bill totaled $11,000.

5M4Uil7d94xRskboBkQSc9t8xdXQ1jcM5oezTj5vkBw_KNv1tgQqMUVIBgeDKCAzmQ1lgphlLq2lQ2LwAlDxYo-1024x682.jpg

When it comes to property taxes, sticker shock is typical in Illinois. From small-business owners in Chicago to suburban dwellers in middle-of-the-pack school districts, long-time Illinoisans are often bewildered as to why they pay the second-highest property taxes in the nation, at an average of more than 2 percent of a home’s value.

And the nonpartisan Tax Foundation said Chicago’s record-setting property-tax hike will likely vault Illinois to the top of the table, making the Land of Lincoln home to the highest property taxes in the U.S.

But an average only tells so much of the story.

Property taxes become a second mortgage that homeowners can never pay off, or an endless expense for a small business that grows more costly each year. The Schurtz family’s first year of property taxes came out to 4 percent of the value of their Geneva, Illinois, home. For many Illinoisans, the burden is even heavier.

Job Varghese, an Indian-American immigrant who left his job with the federal government to strike out as a hospitality entrepreneur, pays $220,000 per year in property taxes on his southern Cook County hotel – more than he pays on the mortgage.

And it gets worse each year. Over the last 10 years, Varghese’s annual property-tax bill has risen by $70,000.

“If I moved my hotel three miles away from here [to Indiana], that $70,000 would be my entire property tax [for one year],” Varghese said.

“Our family came to this country for opportunity, but I find myself discouraging my son from working at our business here.”

A disturbing trend

The pace and scale of property-tax growth over the last few decades in Illinois is overwhelming. Since 1990, residential property taxes have grown 3.3 times faster than the state’s median household income.

Simply put, Illinoisans’ property taxes are going up while salaries are stagnant at best.

Illinois Policy Institute research shows nearly every Illinois county has seen dramatic increases in its residents’ average property-tax burden since 1999.

Residential property taxes now eat up an average of 6.4 percent of a typical household income in Illinois. In 1990, that share was 3.6 percent. In this shift lies the pain currently felt by Illinoisans whose family budgets have been thrown into disarray.

Take Cassandra Bajak, a lifelong Illinoisan and mother of two. Bajak and her husband, an Army veteran, built their Crystal Lake home in 2002. Their children were born and raised there.

Over the last 13 years, the Bajaks’ property-tax bill has doubled. They now pay $1,500 a month in property taxes and insurance. Their mortgage payment is $1,100 a month.

“We’re being taxed out of our home,” Cassandra said.

“… [I]t’s basically like we’re renting our home from the government. [The rate] is well over 4 percent of what the house is worth. The only reason we would ever leave our home or this state is property taxes, and that’s what’s going to happen.”

Bajak said she and her husband plan to move their family to Florida within the next two years. Her reasoning is straightforward: “Taxes are less, and schools are the same,” she said.

Cassandra and her family are not alone.

In McHenry County, where the Bajaks reside, property taxes take up nearly 8 percent of the median household income. The average monthly property-tax bill stands at $499, and the typical property-tax burden in the county has ballooned by over 45 percent since 2000.

Suburban father Peter Brunk has felt the squeeze in Lake Villa, Illinois, which is located in Lake County. Brunk, too, has made plans for an Illinois exit in the near future.

Since his family moved into their home in 2010, the annual property-tax bill has risen by more than $2,300, or nearly 30 percent. Meanwhile, the value of his home actually decreased. The home’s assessed value, which is used to calculate property taxes, has dropped by 11 percent.

“I don’t really want to leave here,” Brunk said. “It’s a nice place. And it’s affordable because we’ve paid off our mortgage.”

“But I look at nine to 10 years [from now] when I retire … my property taxes will completely consume my Social Security check.”

The typical Lake County household’s property-tax burden has risen by 44 percent since 1999, with the average property-tax bill now coming in at more than $600 per month – the most expensive of any Illinois county.

Brunk’s most likely destination after his daughter graduates from high school? Florida. He said the difference in property taxes alone will more than pay for the move and a nicer home.

A closer look at government data reveals the cause behind the meteoric rise of Illinois property taxes, which forces people like Brunk out to greener pastures in other states.

Follow the money

When it comes to property taxes, four main factors drive the pinch felt in Illinois pocketbooks: government-worker pensions, government-worker health care, prevailing-wage requirements and workers’ compensation costs.

These four horsemen of fiscal doom are all multiplied by the sheer number of taxing bodies in Illinois – at nearly 7,000 – each with its own staffing and programming costs. No U.S. state comes close to Illinois on this number.

In Wauconda, Illinois, Mayor Frank Bart sees the squeeze on middle-class residents brought by these rising costs. After accounting for inflation, Wauconda’s median household income hasdropped since 2009, according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates. But property-tax bills have continued to rise.

Why?

Take government-worker pension benefits, for example, which are mandated at the state level,regardless of whether local governments can afford them.

Bart expects police pensions to cost the village over $1 million annually within the next two years. The village has 25 police employees and a general fund budget of just over $9 million.

Bart uses his second-lowest paid police officer to illustrate the high personnel costs village taxpayers shoulder. The officer has been with the village for more than 10 years, and the village pays his $85,000 salary and $15,000 in benefits annually. On top of that, taxpayers contribute $25,000 to his pension each year, Bart said.

That’s not all.

Prevailing-wage laws levy another massive blow to local governments’ bottom lines. These laws can mandate six-figure salaries plus benefits for the lucky private-sector employees who work on government projects. Bart estimates this easily adds 20 percent to project costs above what would be offered in a competitive bidding process.

Finally, while Bart said effective departmental leadership has prevented workers’ compensation costs from getting out of hand in his community, this is not always the case.

Take Williamson County, for example, which has spent $2.7 million on workers’ compensation claims over the last three fiscal years, nearly four times as much as the previous three-year period.

“… [S]ome of this is frivolous,” said Chief Deputy Bob McCurdy, according to The Southern. “We need to make an example of somebody.”

County Board Chairman Jim Marlo echoed McCurdy’s concerns, describing the costs as “eating away” at the county budget.

“It is a system that[’s] easily manipulated in this state and until you get legislative action to change the way claims are handled, the way insurance handles and the way courts handle it, we are going to be faced with this problem,” Marlo said.           

Turning the tables

A major effort to stop Illinois’ sky-high property tax rates from creeping even higher lies in House Bill 4224, which would freeze property taxes at current levels unless local voters approve a future property-tax increase. This legislation is part of Gov. Bruce Rauner’s Turnaround Agenda.

But a freeze alone won’t be enough. Property taxes would have to stay frozen for the next 28 yearsfor Illinois residents’ property-tax burden to return to levels seen in 1990.

So it is important that HB 4224 also gives local governments more flexibility in controlling costs, such as allowing cash-strapped localities to narrow the scope of collective-bargaining agreements and to take less expensive bids for government work.

Another key component to easing residents’ property-tax burden will be aggressive consolidation and resource-sharing across Illinois’ thousands of local taxing bodies. DuPage County has taken the lead in this area. Other counties should follow suit.

When it comes to skyrocketing, unsustainable pension costs, Illinois’ local governments must also be empowered to take control of their fiscal futures by filing bankruptcy. Workers’ compensation reform to bring Illinois’ out-of-whack costs in line with those of surrounding states is another essential piece of the puzzle.

Local leaders in Illinois must actively avoid the ignominious title of the nation’s leader in taxing homeowners.

As average property-tax bills begin to bump up against average mortgage payments, communities will increasingly be ripped apart as people and businesses flee to areas where they need not pay twice for their property: once to the bank and once to the government.

Unfortunately, this is already happening. Many of Chicago’s south suburbs may have already crossed this line in the sand, and face a long, painful road to recovery. Numbers at the state level are equally concerning. Illinois has lost a greater share of its population to out-migration than any Midwestern state since 2010.

Susann D., a retired widow and longtime resident of Mt. Prospect, Illinois, best describes the angst among Illinois’ middle-class residents who can no longer shoulder the tax burden placed upon them by a broken system.

“… the property-tax increase is never a kind of earth-shattering amount,” she said. “But people have to make it work by cutting their budgets. I look online for houses like mine in other states on a similar size lot, and the property taxes are $400 a year. My property taxes here are $7,000 a year.”

“I do want to leave. But this is the most difficult question in my life,” she said.

“If I knew where I was going, that ‘For Sale’ sign would be in front of my house. But I have no family or friends anywhere else. What do I do? Where do I go?”

Susann’s poignant questions should be met with loud cries for reform from Springfield and across the state.

Original article source: https://www.illinoispolicy.org/story/home-is-where-the-hurt-is-how-property-taxes-are-crushing-illinois-middle-class/

Cook County Property Taxes to Hit This Week!

Cook County homeowners can expect the first installment of their property tax bills to show up in mailboxes this week.

Property owners will have until March 4 to pay the bills, which will be equal to 55 percent of the total tax tab paid last year on each piece of land. The second installment, which is scheduled to go out in late June, will show any changes to the bills caused by increased taxes or changes in the value of a property for tax purposes.

For the second year in a row, the bills put together by Treasurer Maria Pappas will include the debt owed by each individual unit of local government. Pappas is trying to highlight the issue of rising local debt, including those for underfunded pension systems.

“I think Treasurer Pappas deserves a lot of credit,” said Laurence Msall, president of the non-partisan Civic Federation budget watchdog group. “She is using (the bill) to communicate to taxpayers on a very serious issue for government, which is rising debt and pension liabilities.”

Original article source: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/chi-cook-county-property-tax-bills-to-hit-this-week-20140127-story.html